Cite this paper:
WANG Jun, LI Zhengfei, SONG Zhuoyan, ZHANG Yun, JIANG Xiaoming, XIE Zhicai. Responses of different biodiversity indices to subsampling efforts in lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages[J]. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2019, 37(1): 122-133

Responses of different biodiversity indices to subsampling efforts in lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages

WANG Jun1,2, LI Zhengfei1,2, SONG Zhuoyan3, ZHANG Yun1,2, JIANG Xiaoming1, XIE Zhicai1
1 CAS Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China;
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Abstract:
As a less time-consuming procedure, subsampling technology has been widely used in biological monitoring and assessment programs. It is clear that subsampling counts affect the value of traditional biodiversity indices, but its effect on taxonomic distinctness (TD) indices is less well studied. Here, we examined the responses of traditional (species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity) and TD (average taxonomic distinctness:Δ+, and variation in taxonomic distinctness:Λ+) indices to subsample counts using a random subsampling procedure from 50 to 400 individuals, based on macroinvertebrate datasets from three different river systems in China. At regional scale, taxa richness asymptotically increased with fixed-count size; ≥ 250-300 individuals to express 95% information of the raw data. In contrast, TD indices were less sensitive to the subsampling procedure. At local scale, TD indices were more stable and had less deviation than species richness and Shannon-Wiener index, even at low subsample counts, with ≥ 100 individuals needed to estimate 95% of the information of the actual Δ+ and Λ+ in the three river basins. We also found that abundance had a certain effect on diversity indices during the subsampling procedure, with different subsampling counts for species richness and TD indices varying by regions. Therefore, we suggest that TD indices are suitable for biodiversity assessment and environment monitoring. Meanwhile, pilot analyses are necessary when to determine the appropriate subsample counts for bioassessment in a new region or habitat type.
Key words:    subsampling|macroinvertebrates|taxonomic distinctness indices|taxa richness|ShannonWiener index   
Received: 2017-11-27   Revised: 2018-01-22
Tools
PDF (642 KB) Free
Print this page
Add to favorites
Email this article to others
Authors
Articles by WANG Jun
Articles by LI Zhengfei
Articles by SONG Zhuoyan
Articles by ZHANG Yun
Articles by JIANG Xiaoming
Articles by XIE Zhicai
References:
Bailey R C, Norris R H, Reynoldson T B. 2001. Taxonomic resolution of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in bioassessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 20(2):280-286.
Barbour M T, Gerritsen J. 1996. Subsampling of benthic samples:a defense of the fixed-count method. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 15(3):386-391.
Bevilacqua S, Fraschetti S, Musco L, Guarnieri G, Terlizzi A. 2011. Low sensitiveness of taxonomic distinctness indices to human impacts:evidences across marine benthic organisms and habitat types. Ecological Indicators, 11(2):448-455.
Bevilacqua S, Fraschetti S, Terlizzi A, Boero F. 2009. The use of taxonomic distinctness indices in assessing patterns of biodiversity in modular organisms. Marine Ecology, 30(2):151-163.
Bevilacqua S, Sandulli R, Plicanti A, Terlizzi A. 2012.Taxonomic distinctness in Mediterranean marine nematodes and its relevance for environmental impact assessment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64(7):1 409-1 416.
Brinkhurst R O. 1986. Guide to the Freshwater Aquatic Microdrile Oligochaetes of North America. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, OttawaCanadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 259p.
Buss D F, Carlisle D M, Chon T S, Culp J, Harding J S, KeizerVelk H E, Robinson W A, Strachan S, Thirion C, Hughes R M. 2015. Stream biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates around the globe:a comparison of large-scale programs.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(1):4 132.
Campbell N, Neat F, Burns F, Kunzlik P. 2011. Species richness, taxonomic diversity, and taxonomic distinctness of the deep-water demersal fish community on the Northeast Atlantic continental slope (ICES Subdivision VIa). ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68(2):365-376.
Cao Y, Larsen D P, Hughes R M. 2001. Evaluating sampling sufficiency in fish assemblage surveys:a similarity-based approach. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58(9):1 782-1 793.
Carter J L, Resh V H. 2001. After site selection and before data analysis:sampling, sorting, and laboratory procedures used in stream benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring programs by USA state agencies. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 20(4):658-682.
Chen K, Hughes R M, Wang B X. 2015. Effects of fixed-count size on macroinvertebrate richness, site separation, and bioassessment of Chinese monsoonal streams. Ecological Indicators, 53:162-170.
Clarke K R, Warwick R M. 1998. A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35(4):523-531.
Clarke K R, Warwick R M. 1999. The taxonomic distinctness measure of biodiversity:weighting of step lengths between hierarchical levels. Marine Ecology Progress, 184:21-29.
Clarke R T, Lorenz A, Sandin L, Schmidt-Kloiber A, Strackbein J, Kneebone N T, Haase P. 2006. Effects of sampling and sub-sampling variation using the STAR-AQEM sampling protocol on the precision of macroinvertebrate metrics.Hydrobiologia, 566(1):441-459.
Courtemanch D L. 1996. Commentary on the subsampling procedures used for rapid bioassessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 15(3):381-385.
Dawaciren, Basang C L, Baima, Qimeiduoji. 2008. Analysis of hydrologic characteristics in the Nepali Yang River Basin.Journal of China Hydrology, 28(4):92-94. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Dudgeon D. 1999. Tropical Asian Streams:Zoobenthos, Ecology and Conservation. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, China. 844p.
Ellingsen K E, Clarke K R, Somerfield P J, Warwick R M. 2005. Taxonomic distinctness as a measure of diversity applied over a large scale:the benthos of the Norwegian continental shelf. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74(6):1 069-1 079.
Epler J H. 2001. Identification Manual for the Larval Chironomidae (Diptera) of North and South Carolina.Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, FL. 490p.
Gallardo B, Gascón S, Quintana X, Comín F A. 2011. How to choose a biodiversity indicator-Redundancy and complementarity of biodiversity metrics in a freshwater ecosystem. Ecological Indicators, 11(5):1 177-1 184.
Heino J, Soininen J, Lappalainen J, Virtanen R. 2005. The relationship between species richness and taxonomic distinctness in freshwater organisms. Limnology and Oceanography, 50(3):978-986.
Hering D, Moog O, Sandin L, Verdonschot P F M. 2004.Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia, 516(1-3):1-20.
Jiang X M, Song Z Y, Xiong J, Xie Z C. 2014. Can excluding non-insect taxa from stream macroinvertebrate surveys enhance the sensitivity of taxonomic distinctness indices to human disturbance? Ecological Indicators, 41:175-182.
Jiang X M, Xie Z C, Chen Y F. 2013. Longitudinal patterns of macroinvertebrate communities in relation to environmental factors in a Tibetan-Plateau river system.Quaternary International, 304:107-114.
Jiang X M, Xiong J, Xie Z C. 2017. Longitudinal and seasonal patterns of macroinvertebrate communities in a large undammed river system in Southwest China. Quaternary International, 440:1-12.
King R S, Richardson C J. 2002. Evaluating subsampling approaches and macroinvertebrate taxonomic resolution for wetland bioassessment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 21(1):150-171.
Ligeiro R, Ferreira W, Hughes R M, Callisto M. 2013. The problem of using fixed-area subsampling methods to estimate macroinvertebrate richness:a case study with Neotropical stream data. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185(5):4 077-4 085.
Lorenz A, Kirchner L, Hering D. 2004. ‘Electronic subsampling’ of macrobenthic samples:how many individuals are needed for a valid assessment result?Hydrobiologia, 516(1-3):299-312.
Magurran A E. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. WileyBlackwell, Malden, MA. 264p.
Marchant R. 2007. The use of taxonomic distinctness to assess environmental disturbance of insect communities from running water. Freshwater Biology, 52(8):1 634-1 645.
McCord S B, Guha G S, Grippo R S. 2007. Effects of subsample size on seasonal and spatial comparisons of stream macroinvertebrate communities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 135(1-3):409-422.
Milošević D, Simić V, Stojković M, Živić I. 2012. Chironomid faunal composition represented by taxonomic distinctness index reveals environmental change in a lotic system over three decades. Hydrobiologia, 683(1):69-82.
Morse J C, Bae Y J, Munkhjargal G, Sangpradub N, Tanida K, Vshivkova T S, Wang B X, Yang L F, Yule C M. 2007.Freshwater biomonitoring with macroinvertebrates in East Asia. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5(1):33-42.
Morse J C, Yang L F, Tian L X. 1994. Aquatic Insects of China useful for Monitoring Water Quality. Hohai University Press, Nanjing. 570p.
Oliveira R B, Mugnai R, Castro C M, Baptista D F. 2011.Determining subsampling effort for the development of a rapid bioassessment protocol using benthic macroinvertebrates in streams of Southeastern Brazil.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 175(1-4):75-85.
Pu Y H, Zhang Y K, Jiang M X, Shi D L, Cao G B, Zhang D G. 2006. Study on plant diversity of Duheyuan nature reserve on the northern slope of Mt. Shennongjia, Hubei, China.Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 24(4):327-332.(in Chinese with English abstract)
Qin W H, Liu L J, Xu W G, Wang Z, Jiang M K. 2008.Prediction of ecological impacts of the planned Xiaonanhai power dam on the rare and endemic fishes nature reserve in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River.Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 24(4):23-26, 36. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Qu X D, Bae M J, Chon T S, Park Y S. 2013. Evaluation of subsampling efforts in estimating community indices and community structures. Ecological Informatics, 17:3-13.
Walsh C J. 1997. A multivariate method for determining optimal subsample size in the analysis of macroinvertebrate samples. Marine and Freshwater Research, 48(3):241-248.
Warwick R M, Clarke K R. 1998. Taxonomic distinctness and environmental assessment. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35(4):532-543.
Wiggins G B. 1996. Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera). University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 456p.
Wilsey B, Stirling G. 2007. Species richness and evenness respond in a different manner to propagule density in developing prairie microcosm communities. Plant Ecology, 190(2):259-273.
Zhang Q T, Hu G K, Yang R R. 2016. Application of taxonomic diversity indices in assessing ecological environment:a review. Environmental Monitoring in China, 32(3):92-98. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhao J, Tang J B, Huang S S, Duan J, Guo X M, Niu D K. 2015. Study on the categories of soil erosion of Chishui River Basin and corresponding measures for soil and water conservation. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 54(14):3 369-3 371. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhao L, Xu Y P, Yang Z W, Xu G J, Wang Z, Xu H L. 2016.Sampling effort of periphytic diatoms for bioassessment research using taxonomic distinctness in marine ecosystems:a case study in coastal waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 112(1-2):389-392.
Zhou C F, Gui H, Zhou K Y. 2003. Larval key to families of Ephemeroptera from China (Insecta). Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 26(3):65-68. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zintzen V, Anderson M J, Roberts C D, Diebel C E. 2011.Increasing variation in taxonomic distinctness reveals clusters of specialists in the deep sea. Ecography, 34(2):306-317.
Copyright © Haiyang Xuebao