Journal of Oceanology and Limnology   2021, Vol. 39 issue(2): 741-754     PDF       
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00343-020-9083-z
Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
0

Article Information

LI Yun, YUAN Wei, ZHANG Yi, LIU Hong, DAI Xilin
Single or combined effects of dietary arabinoxylan-oligosaccharide and inulin on growth performance, gut microbiota, and immune response in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei
Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 39(2): 741-754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00343-020-9083-z

Article History

Received Mar. 26, 2019
accepted in principle Sep. 29, 2019
accepted for publication Jan. 7, 2020
Single or combined effects of dietary arabinoxylan-oligosaccharide and inulin on growth performance, gut microbiota, and immune response in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei
Yun LI1,2,3#, Wei YUAN1#, Yi ZHANG1,2,3, Hong LIU1,2,3, Xilin DAI1     
1 International Research Center for Marine Biosciences at Shanghai Ocean University, Ministry of Science and Technology, Shanghai 201306, China;
2 Key Laboratory of Exploration and Utilization of Aquatic Genetic Resources (Shanghai Ocean University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201306, China;
3 National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education (Shanghai Ocean University), Shanghai 201306, China
Abstract: The single and synergistic effects of dietary arabinoxylan-oligosaccharide (AXOS) and inulin at different doses (2, 4, and 8 mg/g diet) on survival, growth performance, gut microbiota, and immune response in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei were assessed. Singular application of either inulin or AXOS at doses of 4 mg/g diet showed the most stimulatory effects on the growth rate and gene expression levels of chitinase, cathepsin L, chymotrypsin, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in each single prebiotic feeding trial. Compared with single prebiotic treatments, simultaneous application of AXOS and inulin at 4 mg/g diet enhanced remarkably the growth parameters of shrimp and the expression of related genes (chitinase, cathepsin L, chymotrypsin, ERK, myeloid differentiation factor 88, and phenoloxidase) after 8-week feeding (P < 0.05). Additionally, gut microbiota analysis indicated the dietary supplementation with combined prebiotics increased significantly the bacterial community richness and relative abundance of Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Bacteriovorax, and Lactobacillus, and reduced the abundance of Vibrio, Rhodococcus, and Photobacterium in the digestive tract of L. vannamei. Compared with the single prebiotic treatment and the control, combined prebiotics supplementation boosted notably the survival rate and expression levels of immune-related genes in shrimp infected with Vibrio alginolyticus or white spot syndrome virus. Therefore, simultaneous application of AXOS and inulin shall have a great potential of dietary supplement in the culture of L. vannamei.
Keywords: prebiotic    growth    intestinal microflora    immunity    survival    Litopenaeus vannamei    
1 INTRODUCTION

Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) originates in South America, and has become the most important penaeid shrimp cultured in the world. However, various diseases and stresses induced by environmental pollution and high cultural density have become the major obstacles to the industry of shrimp culture (Walker and Mohan, 2009). Therefore, it is urgent to search for natural dietary supplements to improve the growth performance and disease resistance of cultured shrimp.

Having merits of natural, safe, and reliable characteristics, prebiotics have recently attracted extensive attention as good potential supplements in aquaculture (Ringø et al., 2010). Prebiotics are defined as non-digestible food ingredients, providing advantageous effects for the host by improving growth as well as the activity of the intestinal beneficial bacteria (Gibson, 1999). Gut microbiota constitutes a highly complex and effective microecosystem in the host gastrointestinal tract and plays a crucial role in regulating nutrition, metabolism, and immunity of animal (Wardwell et al., 2011). Thus, certain groups of intestinal bacteria, including Bacillales and lactic acid bacteria, could enhance their relative populations in the gut flora by utilizing the fermentation of prebiotics that might not be hydrolyzed in the digestive tract of the host (Pool-Zobel et al., 2002; Flickinger et al., 2003). Additionally, prebiotic-stimulated beneficial bacteria have been shown to improve the host growth performance by increasing the expression and activity of intestinal digestive enzymes in aquatic animals (Daniels et al., 2010; Akhter et al., 2015). Carbohydrases (cellulase, amylase, and chitinase), lipases, and proteases (trypsin and chymotrypsin) constitute the major digestive enzymes in crustacean gastrointestinal tract, and the expression levels as well as activities of these enzymes are believed to be the important indicators of digestive function and growth status of the animal. Moreover, dietary prebiotics have also been demonstrated to improve the disease resistance and innate immune response in aquatic species (Dong and Wang, 2013; Zhang et al., 2014).

Prebiotics can be divided generally into two main groups: oligosaccharides and polysaccharides, according to the chain length of carbohydrate. Oligosaccharides, such as fructooligosaccharides (FOS), galactooligosaccharides (GOS), mannan oligosaccharides (MOS), xylooligosaccharides (XOS), and arabinoxylan-oligosaccharides (AXOS), have been extensively applied as growth or immunity stimulants in fish and shellfish (Ringø et al., 2010; Ganguly et al., 2013). Arabinoxylan-oligosaccharide is a short-chain hydrolysis product of arabinoxylan, and naturally present in outer cell wall of various cereal grains. As a component of dietary fiber, AXOS has been utilized by the intestinal flora, which induces positive impacts on many physiological activities of organism (Ringø et al., 2010). Using AXOS and other hydrolysis products of arabinoxylan as natural dietary supplementations has been proved beneficial to growth performance, feed utilization, and innate immunity in many animals. AXOS supplemented diet showed obviously stimulatory effects on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, and immune responses in Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii) (Geraylou et al., 2013). Application of dietary xylooligosaccharides remarkably elevated the activities of peroxidase and lysozyme, survival, and resistance against bacterial infection in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) (Van Doan et al., 2018). Furthermore, polysaccharides are polymeric carbohydrates composed of a quantity of monosaccharides bound by glycosidic linkages, and generally obtained from natural biomaterials (Chen and Huang, 2018). Diets supplemented with polysaccharides, such as glucan, pectin, inulin or chitin, have also shown a great potential for growth promotion and immune regulation in aquatic species (Roberfroid, 2005; Ringø et al., 2010; Ganguly et al., 2013). Administration of dietary β-glucan exhibited significant improvements in the growth rate, survival and immune response in Labeo rohita fingerlings (Misra et al., 2006) and large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea) (Ai et al., 2007). Supplementation with inulin caused positive effects on growth performance and gut microbiota in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) (Syed Raffic Ali et al., 2016). Inulin-fed shrimp gained obvious improvements of phenoloxidase activity and pathogen resistance, compared with the control (Luna-González et al., 2012).

A growing number of reports recently indicates that combined application of different prebiotics has shown more effective promotion of growth performance and immune response in aquaculture. A previous study showed the synergistic effects of MOS and FOS in narrow-clawed crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus) with significant enhancement in growth rate, survival, and stress resistance compared with the individual treatment and control (Safari et al., 2014). In addition, applying β-glucan combined with MOS obviously promoted the resistance against bacterial infection and increased specific growth rate of sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus) (Gu et al., 2011), and immune response in pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus) (Soares et al., 2018).

However, research on the effects of dietary AXOS combined with inulin on the growth performance and immune responses in crustaceans, especially in L. vannamei, is still limited. Therefore, the simultaneous effects of the prebiotic combination, AXOS, and inulin on gut microbiota, growth performance, and immune response in Pacific white shrimp were evaluated, and a potential dietary supplement in shrimp culture was explored.

2 MATERIAL AND METHOD 2.1 Culture system and shrimp

Litopenaeus vannamei in similar size were obtained from Pudong aquatic products market (Shanghai, China), and reared at the Aquaculture Breeding Center of Shanghai Ocean University (Shanghai, China). Random PCR detection was performed to assure the experimental shrimp to be pathogens free. The culture system consisted of 36 indoor fiberglass tanks (high: 1.2 m; diameter: 1.9 m; volume: 2 000 L) with continuous aeration and recirculating seawater supply at a flow rate of 20 L/min per tank.

Healthy shrimp were randomly distributed into 36 tanks in the initial population density of 220 shrimp per tank, and fed with untreated formulated diet for 14 days to acclimate to the culture conditions. Uneaten food and feces were siphoned out every day. After acclimation, the experimental diets containing prebiotics were provided at 5%–8% of body weight daily and fed to shrimp at 7:00, 11:00, 16:00, and 20:00. Shrimp in the control were fed with basal diet with no prebiotics. The feeding rate was regulated according to the feed consumption. Salinity, temperature, pH, and total ammonia nitrogen of water were monitored daily and kept at 31±0.5, 28±1 ℃, 8.1±0.05, and 0.06±0.005 mg/L, respectively.

2.2 Preparation of experimental diets

All the experimental diets were manufactured at Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed Laboratory of Shanghai Ocean University. The basal formulated diets, designed according to the nutrition requirement of Pacific white shrimp, were supplemented with inulin (90% purity) (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA) and arabinoxylan-oligosaccharide (94% purity) (Yinuo Biotech Co. Ltd., Ningbo, Zhejiang, China) at different designed concentrations. Mixture of prebiotic and other ingredients were pelletized into uniform pellets (diameter of 1.2 mm), and dried in oven in 40 ℃ for 18 h. All the diets were kept at -20 ℃ before being used. Following the accredited methods (AOAC, 2000), the experimental diets were analyzed to contain averagely 45.87% crude protein, 7.88% crude lipid, 10.2% ash, and 9.27% moisture, and the ingredient contained soybean meal, fish meal and squid muscle meal as protein sources, and fish oil as lipid source. The formulation of the diets applied in feeding experiments is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Formulation and proximate chemical composition (g/kg dry weight) of the experimental diets
2.3 Feeding trial

Single-prebiotic feeding trials were conducted respectively to evaluate the stimulatory effects of two different prebiotics (AXOS or inulin). Single prebiotic feeding trial consisted of four experimental groups, each of which was further divided into three replicates. Two hundred acclimated shrimp in similar size (8.08±0.46 g) were kept in each replicative tank and fed with experimental diet for 8 weeks. Prebiotic-treated groups were fed with AXOS or inulin at three supplemented levels: 2, 4, and 8 mg/g diet. Shrimp of the control group were fed with zero prebiotic basal diet.

On the basis of the results of single feeding trials, a 56-day combined feeding experiment was performed subsequently to assess the synergistic effects of dietary supplementation of combined prebiotics as compared to the single treatments. Similar to the previous single feeding trial, the combined feeding trial was composed of four diet groups, giving three replicates per diet. The four groups were fed diets with AXOS only, inulin only, combination of AXOS and inulin, and control, respectively. The dose of prebiotic used in different supplemented diets was 4 mg/g.

2.4 Pathogen challenge trial

Pathogen challenge tests were performed to assess the effects of prebiotics on the immune response of shrimp against two major pathogens, Vibrio alginolyticus and white spot syndrome virus (WSSV). On the termination of combined feeding trial, 100 shrimp from each replicate were equally distributed into two groups for WSSV and V. alginolyticus challenge, respectively. The WSSV stock and bacterial strain were provided by National Pathogen Collection Center for Aquatic Animals (Shanghai, China). The purified WSSV inoculant was prepared as the method described previously (Xie et al., 2005) and quantified by the real-time PCR using specific primers of WSSV (Table 2). Then the WSSV inoculum was completely diluted into sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution to the designed concentration (108 copies/ mL). In addition, after an incubation on the tryptic soy agar overnight at 28 ℃, V. alginolyticus used in bacteria challenge were cultured in tryptic soy broth at 28 ℃ for 24 h, and then the bacterial suspension was centrifuged at 8 000 g for 15 min and diluted with PBS to the designed concentration of 107 CFU/ mL.

Table 2 Nucleotide sequences of the primers used in this study

Every experimental shrimp received an injection into the ventral sinus of cephalothorax with 200-μL virus inoculum containing 2×107 WSSV copies for virus challenge or 200-μL V. alginolyticus suspension for bacteria challenge. In addition, 50 untreated shrimp injected with 200 μL/shrimp PBS were used as the negative control. The challenge trial lasted for five days, and all the experimental shrimp were also fed with the same diets applied in the previous feeding trial. During the challenge period, the infected shrimp in different experimental groups were monitored for the cumulative mortality daily.

2.5 Sampling and calculation

Biometric indexes of experimental shrimp under different treatments were measured and recorded on the termination of feeding experiment. All the experimental shrimp were fasted on the sampling days. All the animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines and approval of Animal Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ocean University. After anesthesia in ice bath, hepatopancreas, intestine, hemolymph, and gill tissues of 15 shrimp from each experimental group were collected on Days 28 and 56 of feeding trials. Gill and hemolymph from nine shrimp in each group were sampled on Day 5 post infection (dpi) in the challenge test of WSSV or V. alginolyticus, respectively. Hemolymph (approximately 200 μL) was collected from the ventral sinus cavity of each sampled animal with 1-mL syringe, and mixed with same volume of modified anticoagulant solution (Huang et al., 2010) immediately.

In this research, the related parameters were calculated as follows:

specific growth rate (SGR; %/d)=(lnFBW– lnIBW)×100/d,

average daily weight gain (ADG; g/d)=(FBW– IBW)/d,

feed conversion ratio (FCR)=FO/(FBW–IBW),

where FBW is the final mean body weight (g) of shrimp, IBW is initial mean body weight (g), d is the experimental duration in days, and FO is feed offered (g).

Survival (%)=(Nf/Ni)×100,

where Nf and Ni are the final number and initial number of the experimental shrimp, respectively.

2.6 High-throughput sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA

gDNA of intestinal tissue was extracted using a TIANamp Marine Animals DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified with barcoded primers 341F (5'-CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG-3') and 806R (5'-GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT-3'). The PCR products were purified with a SanPrep Column PCR Product Purification Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) and sent to OE Biotech. Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China, for intestinal bacterial community analysis.

2.7 Relative quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA from different tissue samples (Hemolymph, hepatopancreas, intestine, and gill) was isolated with a PureLinkTM RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). Concentration and quality of extracted RNA were determined by the SP-752 spectrophotometer (Spectrum, Shanghai, China). The total RNA was treated with gDNase (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) to remove the contaminated DNA. The first strand of cDNA was reversely transcribed from total RNA using SuperScriptTM Ⅳ First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) following the instruction.

The relative quantitative real-time PCR analysis with gene specific primers (Table 2) were used to investigate the change in related gene transcription levels in this study. The quantitative PCR reaction was carried out with Eco Real-Time PCR System (Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, USA) in a 20-μL reaction volume containing 0.6 μmol/L of each specific primer, 10 μL RealUniversal PreMix (SYBR Green I) (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China), and 50-ng cDNA template. After an initial denaturation for 10 min, the PCR reaction was carried out for 40 cycles followed the cycles of 95 ℃ for 10 s, 60 ℃ for 25 s, and 72 ℃ for 30 s. The target gene expression was normalized with L. vannamei 18S rRNA gene and quantified with the comparative CT method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).

2.8 Data analysis

All the data were statistically analyzed using software SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) and presented as mean±standard deviation. The normality of data was assessed by Shapiro-Wilk's test prior to analysis, and homogeneity of variance was assessed by Levene's test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to identify the differences of related data between different treatments, and two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the synergistic effects between AXOS and inulin on growth parameters, survival, and the expression of related genes. The significant differences among the groups were detected with Duncan's multiple range test. Significance was accepted at the probability level less than 0.05. In addition, Kaplan-Meier plot log-rank χ2 tests were performed to examine the significant differences of survivals in the challenge trials.

3 RESULT 3.1 Growth parameters and growth-related genes expression in AXOS feeding experiment

Compared to the control group, significantly enhanced final mean body weight (FBW) (18.71±0.39 g), average daily weight gain (ADG) (0.19±0.02 g/d) and specific growth rate (SGR) (1.47%±0.15%/d), as well as noticeably lower feed conversion ratio (FCR) (2.02±0.26) were observed in shrimp fed with 4 mg/g AXOS (P < 0.05) (Table 3). However, dietary supplementation with 2 or 8 mg/g AXOS showed no significant effect on FBW, ADG, SGR, and FCR compared to the control (P > 0.05). Survival ranged from 86.56% to 88.46%, and no obvious difference was observed among all the groups in AXOS-feeding experiment (P > 0.05).

Table 3 Growth parameters and survival of L. vannamei fed in different doses of prebiotics in 56-day feeding trials

Expressions of chitinase, cathepsin L, and chymotrypsin in hepatopancreas were investigated on Days 28 and 56 of the trial. Chitinase and chymotrypsin expression in shrimp from 4 or 8 mg/g AXOS treatment was clearly elevated on Day 28 in comparison to control (P < 0.05), and gradually increased to the peak on Day 56 (Fig. 1). Additionally, shrimp fed with diets supplemented with various doses of AXOS (2, 4, and 8 mg/g) showed significantly boosted expressions of cathepsin L and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) on Days 28 and 56 comparing to the control, and the highest values of cathepsin L and ERK expression were detected in the 4 and 8 mg/g AXOS treatments on Day 56.

Fig.1 Effects of diets supplemented with AXOS at different doses on the expression levels of growth-related genes in L. vannamei The expression levels of chitinase, cathepsin L, chymotrypsin and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) were detected using relative quantitative real time PCR. Data are represented as the means±SD. Significant differences (P < 0.05) are indicated with different letters.
3.2 Growth parameters and growth-related genes expression in inulin feeding experiment

The result of inulin feeding experiment revealed that the dietary supplementation with 4 or 8 mg/g inulin could significantly enhance FBW, SGR, and ADG of shrimp comparing to the control (P < 0.05), and no noticeable difference of those growth parameters mentioned above was detected between 4 and 8 mg/g inulin treatments (P > 0.05). Meanwhile, dietary supplementation with 4 mg/g inulin induced significantly lower FCR (1.95±0.34) than that of the control (P < 0.05). Similar to the result of AXOS treatments, there was no obvious difference of survival among groups by the end of inulin feeding experiment (P > 0.05).

The diets supplemented with inulin from 2 to 8 mg/g noticeably promoted the expression of cathepsin L, chymotrypsin, and ERK on Days 28 and 56 in comparison to the control, and the highest expression levels of these gene were observed in 4 mg/g inulin treatment on Day 56 (Fig. 2). Additionally, the shrimp from 2 and 4 mg/g dietary inulin groups showed no obvious difference of cathepsin L expression after 56-day feeding, and no significant difference of chymotrypsin expression between 4 and 8 mg/g inulin groups was observed (P > 0.05). However, the expression of chitinase exhibited no significant change among all the groups on Day 28, but then obviously increased on Day 56 in the inulin-treated groups (2, 4, and 8 mg/g) (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the highest chitinase expression was observed in the 4 mg/g inulin group on Day 56, followed by 8 mg/g inulin, 2 mg/g inulin, and the control.

Fig.2 Effects of diets supplemented with inulin at different doses on the expression levels of growth-related genes in L. vannamei Data are represented as the means±SD. Bars with different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05).
3.3 Growth performance and expression of growth and immune related genes in the combined prebiotics feeding experiment

Compared with single prebiotic feeding, 56-day feeding of combined prebiotics (4 mg/g AXOS and 4 mg/g inulin) induced significant improvements of FBW (23.19±0.66 g), SGR (1.81%±0.09%/d), ADG (0.27±0.03 g/d), and survival (94.08%±1.22%), as well as lower FCR (1.82±0.27) of experimental shrimp (P < 0.05) (Table 3).

Similar to the result of growth performance, the related genes expression exhibited much more improvement in the combined prebiotics feeding group. The shrimp fed with prebiotic combination showed obviously higher expression of chitinase, cathepsin L, and chymotrypsin in hepatopancreas than those treated with prebiotic separately on Days 28 and 56 (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the expression levels of ERK, myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), and phenoloxidase (PO) of hemolymph samples were obviously elevated in simultaneous prebiotic treatment, compared to the other treatments, on the termination of the feeding trial.

Fig.3 Effects of combined dietary AXOS (4 mg/g diet) and inulin (4 mg/g diet) on the expression levels of growth and immune related genes of L. vannamei in combined feeding trial and before (0 day) or 5 days after WSSV/V. alginolyticus challenge Data are represented as the means±SD. Means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05, Duncan's multiple range test).
3.4 Intestinal microbiota

To investigate the impacts of supplementations on the gut microflora of experimental shrimp, the intestinal samples from shrimp fed with prebiotics or basal diet were analyzed. The Alpha diversity analysis indicated that the bacterial community richness (Chao and Ace) of shrimp in separate or combined supplemented groups were remarkably higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference among the prebiotic-treated groups (P > 0.05) (Table 4). In addition, diets supplemented with AXOS and inulin, separately or simultaneously, showed no significant effect on the intestinal bacterial diversity (Shannon and Simpson) of experimental shrimp, compared to the basal diet without prebiotic (P > 0.05).

Table 4 Data from high-throughput sequencing yields bacterial diversity and richness

The result of high-throughput sequencing revealed that the most abundant bacterial phyla in intestinal bacterial community of L. vannamei were related to Proteobactaria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadetes, and Acidobacteria (Fig. 4). The Top 5 most abundant bacterial genera in the untreated shrimp were Vibrio, Rhodococcus, Photobacterium, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter (Fig. 5). The 56-day administration of prebiotic combination remarkably increased the abundance of Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Lactobacillus, and Bacteriovorax in shrimp gastrointestinal tract in comparison to the other diets (P < 0.05) (Fig. 5). In addition, the intestinal Vibrio, Rhodococcus, and Photobacterium in shrimp fed diets with supplementation, separately or simultaneously, decreased observably at the end of feeding trial (P < 0.05).

Fig.4 Intestinal bacterial community composition at phylum level in L. vannamei fed with different diets in combined prebiotics feeding experiment
Fig.5 Top 10 most abundant bacterial genera in intestine of L. vannamei in different treatment groups Bars with asterisks indicate significant (P < 0.05) differences compared with the control.
3.5 WSSV/Vibrio alginolyticus challenge

Monitoring the shrimp survival during the pathogen infections demonstrated that either individual or simultaneous application of dietary AXOS as well as inulin markedly increased the survival of shrimp under the virus or bacterial infection (P < 0.05). In addition, the combined prebiotics-treated shrimp showed the maximum value of survival at the end of two challenge tests (Fig. 6).

Fig.6 The survival of L. vannamei treated with dietary AXOS and inulin, singularly and together, on Day 5 after infection of WSSV or V. alginolyticus Differences in survival between treatments were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plot log-rank χ2 test. Different lowercase and uppercase letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05) in WSSV or V. alginolyticus challenge test.

The diets with separate or combined supplementations obviously elevated the gene expressions of chitinase, cathepsin L, chymotrypsin, MyD88, and PO in L. vannamei on Day 5 comparing to those before WSSV infection (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3). Additionally, the combined-prebiotic supplemented diet exhibited more positive effects to expression of those genes mentioned above in comparison to other treatments on Day 5. In contrast, the ERK expression of every dietary treatment declined markedly on Day 5 compared with the beginning of virus challenge (P < 0.05), and no obvious difference of ERK expression was detected among treatments.

In V. alginolyticus challenge experiment, the expressions of cathepsin L, chymotrypsin, MyD88 and PO in each prebiotic treatment were markedly promoted on the 5th day post bacteria injection (dpi) (P < 0.05), and shrimp treated with AXOS and inulin together exhibited remarkably higher expression levels of these four genes on 5 dpi in comparison with shrimp fed single prebiotic or basal diet (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3). However, the chitinase expression of shrimp fed different diets on 5 dpi was not observably different to the expression at the beginning of bacterial challenge, and the peak level of chitinase expression on 5 dpi appeared in combination group. Furthermore, the expression level of ERK in each prebiotic-fed group decreased significantly at the end of the infection test (P < 0.05), but the shrimp in combination feeding group still gained observably higher ERK expression as compared to the other experimental groups.

4 DISCUSSION

Application of dietary prebiotic as feed supplementation has been shown significant positive effects on growth performance and survival in fish as well as shellfish, while the effects seemed to be varied in different species of hosts and dosages of prebiotic. For example, administration of 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mg/g dietary xylooligosaccharides (XOS) significantly enhanced the relative gain rate (RGR) and average daily weight gain (ADG) of allogynogenetic crucian carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) (Xu et al., 2009). European lobster (Homarus gammarus) larvae fed MOS showed remarkable improvement in growth parameters and survival comparing with the control (Daniels et al., 2010). On the contrary, dietary isomaltooligosaccharide (IMO) and fructooligosaccharide (FOS) at doses of 2 and 6 mg/g showed no obvious effect on the growth rate and FCR of hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) (He et al., 2003). No observable impact on the feed intake, weight gain, and feed efficiency of Atlantic salmon (S. salar) was detected after 4-month feeding with 10 g/kg MOS (Grisdale-Helland et al., 2008). In present study, diets supplemented with AXOS or inulin at different doses showed significant promotion to the growth, feed conversion, and expressions of related genes in L. vannamei. The highest values of those parameters mentioned above were detected in the application of single prebiotic at dose of 4 mg/g, which was considered as the optimum dose of prebiotic for the subsequent combined feeding. Previous research indicated that the stimulatory effects might vary in the prebiotics of different chain lengths. Comparative studies on fecal cultures revealed that the fermentations of inulin and FOS could be utilized by different beneficial bacteria in host digestive tract (Rossi et al., 2005; van de Wiele et al., 2007), and the transition time through the host gastrointestinal tract increased following the increasing chain length of prebiotic (Rumessen and Gudmand-Høyer, 1998). Thus, previous studies provided a new perspective on the application of combined prebiotics of different chain lengths as a more effective dietary supplement, due to the potentially synergistic and adjuvant effects on the modulation of gut microbial community. The application of combined dietary prebiotics has already been shown to promote growth and immune responses much more efficiently in several aquatic species (Ringø et al., 2010; Safari et al., 2014). In this research, administration of combined prebiotics at the optimum dose (4 mg/g) showed greater promotion on the expressions of related genes and growth parameters than those of individual treatments of basal diet.

The stimulatory effect of prebiotic on shrimp growth might be realized mainly through the up-regulation of beneficial bacteria in host gastrointestinal tract. Several species of bacteria (generally known as "probiotic" with other beneficial microorganisms), particularly members of the genus Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Lactobacillus have been reported as stimulants of growth performance and immune response in finfish and shellfish (Wang, 2007; Sahu et al., 2008). However, since the potential impact to the environment, food safety, and decline of bacterial activity during the feed preparation, the direct application of probiotic bacteria in aquaculture has been still limited (Ringø et al., 2010). Therefore, administration of dietary prebiotic was believed to be a safer and more effective approach to perform the function of beneficial bacteria in industrial aquaculture. The fermentation of prebiotics provides carbon and energy sources to certain groups of beneficial bacteria in the digestive tract of aquatic species. This study indicated that the application of dietary AXOS and inulin together significantly improved the abundance of several species of beneficial bacteria such as Bacteriovorax, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Lactobacillus in the shrimp gastrointestinal tract. Meanwhile, enhanced bacterial community richness was also observed within prebiotic-treated shrimp in this study. Similar findings have been reported with the dietary supplementation of MOS in European lobster (Homarus Gammarus) (Daniels et al., 2010), as well as application of dietary inulin on hybrid surubim (Pseudoplatystoma sp.) (Mouriño et al., 2012). The result of this study also demonstrated that AXOS and inulin showed obviously negative effects on the abundance of intestinal pathogenic bacteria such as Vibrio. Previous investigations suggested that probiotic bacteria also showed the positive impacts to the immune response via production of specific antimicrobial substances and competitive exclusion of detrimental bacteria (Pandiyan et al., 2013).

Probiotic bacteria were regarded as improving the growth through stimulating the secretion of digestive enzymes (Wang, 2007; Pandiyan et al., 2013), the synthesis of essential nutrients such as vitamins, biotin and fatty acids (Newaj-Fyzul et al., 2014), and improvement to the intestinal morphology in aquatic animals (Daniels et al., 2010). The digestive enzymes play a crucial role in digestion of nutrients, molting regulation and immune response (Lovett and Felder, 1990). Proteases, chitinase, and lipases constitute the major digestive enzymes in the crustacean digestive system, and the expression levels of these enzymes are believed the important indicators to evaluate the growth status of organism. Chymotrypsin and trypsin are the most abundant proteolytic enzymes in the digestive glands of Decapoda, and play a key role in protein digestion (Lemos et al., 2000). In addition, chymotrypsin also exerts great influences on immunoregulation including blood clotting, melanization, and pathogen resistance (Lai et al., 2005; Xue et al., 2013). Chitinase is another essential enzyme for crustaceans, which is involved in molting process, digestion of chitinous food and degradation of endogenous chitin (Proespraiwong et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2017). Similar to chymotrypsin, chitinase was reported to participate in the immune response to pathogens and ammonia nitrogen stress (Zhou et al., 2017). Additionally, cathepsin L is regarded as a multifunctional lysosomal endopeptidase and involved in various physiological processes, including protein degradation, food digestion and immune regulation (Hu and Leung, 2007). Previous studies on shrimp species indicated that cathepsin functioned as a major digestive enzyme during the intracellular digestion of endocytosed nutrition in hepatopancreas (Hu and Leung, 2007; Stephens et al., 2012), and participated in the regulation of intermolt cycle (Glenn et al., 2005). Therefore, the significant improvements of shrimp growth parameters (SGR, ADG, and FCR), with the simultaneous use of AXOS and inulin could be attributed to the remarkably enhanced abundance of intestinal beneficial bacteria and consequent up-regulation of the expressions of various digestive enzymes in hepatopancreas.

In addition, we also demonstrated that the dietary supplementation with AXOS and inulin exerted positive effects on the survival and immune-related gene expression of infected shrimp during the pathogen challenges. Similar findings have been reported in tropical spiny lobsters (Panulirus ornatus) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with dietary supplementation of MOS (Sang and Fotedar, 2010; Ahmadi et al., 2014), and Siberian sturgeon (A. baerii) treated with dietary AXOS (Geraylou et al., 2013). It is well known that crustaceans lack an adaptive immune system, and the innate immune system plays a vital role in the immune defense against invading pathogens. The first step of the innate immune defense is the recognition of conserved motifs in exogenous pathogens by a series of receptors in innate immune system that referred to as pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs). Toll-like receptor (TLR) functions as the most important PRR in the Toll pathway, which is an important signaling pathway in crustacean innate immune system. Following the specific recognition of pathogen structurally conserved motifs, MyD88, an important adapter protein, is recruited to activate a series of intracellular signaling cascades through specific interaction with cytoplasmic Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain of TLR (Li and Xiang, 2013). Recent studies show that MyD88 plays a key role to link the TLRs and a set of downstream immune factors in the shrimp immune responses against different microorganisms (Li and Xiang, 2013; Wen et al., 2013). Furthermore, melanotic encapsulation is another effective innate immune mechanism of arthropods to resist invading pathogens. Phenoloxidase (PO) is a key enzyme in the prophenoloxidase (proPO)-activating system, which is the main enzymatic reaction mechanism to result in melanization in crustaceans. Similar to the Toll signaling pathway, the recognizing reaction between pathogen conserved motif and specific PRR led to the proteolytic cleavage of prophenoloxidase zymogen to form active PO enzyme, and the activation of PO subsequently induced the formation of the polymeric melanin (Amparyup et al., 2013). Meanwhile, dietary supplementation with prebiotic showed obvious improvement of PO in several aquatic species (Ringø et al., 2010; Amparyup et al., 2013; Dong and Wang, 2013). As a member of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) superfamily, the signaling pathway of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) played an important role in a variety of cellular activities, including cell differentiation, cell proliferation, and cytokine production (Li et al., 2013). In invertebrate, ERK was reported to participate in the immune responses to bacterial and viral infections (Shi et al., 2012; Li et al., 2013). In addition, previous research demonstrated that some species of viruses might utilize host ERK signaling pathway to maximize viral replication and expression of related genes (Shi et al., 2012). Therefore, our findings demonstrate that the diet supplemented with AXOS or inulin could obviously improve ERK expression of experimental shrimp, and the subsequent reduction in the gene expression of ERK during the virus challenge test should be associated with the utilization of ERK signaling pathway by white spot syndrome virus to benefit its invasion to the organism. Therefore, the dietary supplementation with AXOS and inulin could not only significantly improved the shrimp growth performance via regulating the gut microbiota and expression of related digestive enzymes, but also show a greater success in improving the immune response and pathogen resistance by up-regulating various immune-related genes.

5 CONCLUSION

We revealed that the diet supplemented of AXOS and inulin, separately or simultaneously, could clearly promote the growth performance by up-regulating expressions of the growth-related genes and modulating the gut microbiota in Pacific white shrimp. Furthermore, the prebiotic combination induced more remarkable elevation in the resistance against pathogen infection via boosting innate immune responses in shrimp. All the findings indicated the simultaneous application of AXOS and inulin could serve as a candidate dietary supplement in L. vannamei culture.

6 DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data generated during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References
Ahmadi P Y, Farahmand H, Miandare H K, Mirvaghefi A, Hoseinifar S H. 2014. The effects of dietary Immunogen® on innate immune response, immune related genes expression and disease resistance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 37(2): 209-214. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2014.02.006
Ai Q H, Mai K S, Zhang L, Tan B P, Zhang W B, Xu W, Li H T. 2007. Effects of dietary β-1, 3 glucan on innate immune response of large yellow croaker, Pseudosciaena crocea. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 22(4): 394-402. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2006.06.011
Akhter N, Wu B, Memon A M, Mohsin M. 2015. Probiotics and prebiotics associated with aquaculture: a review. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 45(2): 733-741. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2015.05.038
Amparyup P, Charoensapsri W, Tassanakajon A. 2013. Prophenoloxidase system and its role in shrimp immune responses against major pathogens. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 34(4): 990-1001. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2012.08.019
AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC international. 17th edn. AOAC, Arlington, VA. p. 152-169.
Chen L, Huang G L. 2018. The antiviral activity of polysaccharides and their derivatives. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 115: 77-82. DOI:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.056
Daniels C L, Merrifield D L, Boothroyd D P, Davies S J, Factor J R, Arnold K E. 2010. Effect of dietary Bacillus spp. and mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) on European lobster (Homarus gammarus L.) larvae growth performance, gut morphology and gut microbiota. Aquaculture, 304(1-4): 49-57. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.03.018
Dong C H, Wang J. 2013. Immunostimulatory effects of dietary fructooligosaccharides on red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard). Aquaculture Research, 44(9): 1416-1424. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03146.x
Flickinger E A, Van Loo J, Fahey G C. 2003. Nutritional responses to the presence of inulin and oligofructose in the diets of domesticated animals: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 43(1): 19-60. DOI:10.1080/10408690390826446
Ganguly S, Dora K C, Sarkar S, Chowdhury S. 2013. Supplementation of prebiotics in fish feed: a review. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 23(2): 195-199. DOI:10.1007/s11160-012-9291-5
Geraylou Z, Souffreau C, Rurangwa E, de Meester L, Courtin C M, Delcour J A, Buyse J, Ollevier F. 2013. Effects of dietary arabinoxylan-oligosaccharides (AXOS) and endogenous probiotics on the growth performance, non-specific immunity and gut microbiota of juvenile Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii). Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 35(3): 766-775. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2013.06.014
Gibson G R. 1999. Dietary modulation of the human gut microflora using the prebiotics oligofructose and inulin. The Journal of Nutrition, 129(7): 1438S-1441S. DOI:10.1093/jn/129.7.1438S
Glenn K L, Grapes L, Suwanasopee T, Harris D L, Li Y, Wilson K, Rothschild M F. 2005. SNP analysis of AMY2 and CTSL genes in Litopenaeus vannamei and Penaeus monodon shrimp. Animal Genetics, 36(3): 235-236. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2005.01274.x
Grisdale-Helland B, Helland S J, Gatlin Ⅲ D M. 2008. The effects of dietary supplementation with mannanoligosaccharide, fructooligosaccharide or galactooligosaccharide on the growth and feed utilization of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture, 283(1-4): 163-167. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.07.012
Gu M, Ma H M, Mai K S, Zhang W B, Bai N, Wang X J. 2011. Effects of dietary β-glucan, mannan oligosaccharide and their combinations on growth performance, immunity and resistance against Vibrio splendidus of sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 31(2): 303-309. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2011.05.018
He S W, Xu G H, Wu Y C, Weng H T, Xie H Q. 2003. Effects of isomaltooligosaccharide and fructooligosaccharide on the growth performance and non-specific immunity in hybrid tilapia. China Feed, (23): 14-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI:10.15906/j.cnki.cn11-2975/s.2003.23.008
Hu K J, Leung P C. 2007. Food digestion by cathepsin L and digestion-related rapid cell differentiation in shrimp hepatopancreas. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 146(1): 69-80. DOI:10.1016/j.cbpb.2006.09.010
Huang J W, Yang Y, Wang A L. 2010. Reconsideration of phenoloxidase activity determination in white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 28(1): 240-244. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2009.10.010
Lai C Y, Cheng W, Kuo C M. 2005. Molecular cloning and characterisation of prophenoloxidase from haemocytes of the white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 18(5): 417-430. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2004.10.004
Lemos D, Ezquerra J M, Garcia-Carreño F L. 2000. Protein digestion in penaeid shrimp: digestive proteinases, proteinase inhibitors and feed digestibility. Aquaculture, 186(1-2): 89-105. DOI:10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00371-3
Li F H, Xiang J H. 2013. Signaling pathways regulating innate immune responses in shrimp. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 34(4): 973-980. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2012.08.023
Li X P, Meng X H, Kong J, Luo K, Luan S, Cao B X, Liu N, Pang J F, Shi X L. 2013. Identification, cloning and characterization of an extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) from Chinese shrimp, Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 35(6): 1882-1890. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2013.09.021
Livak K J, Schmittgen T D. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods, 25(4): 402-408. DOI:10.1006/meth.2001.1262
Lovett D L, Felder D L. 1990. Ontogenetic change in digestive enzyme activity of larval and postlarval white shrimp Penaeus setiferus (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae). The Biological Bulletin, 178(2): 144-159. DOI:10.2307/1541973
Luna-González A, Almaraz-Salas J C, Fierro-Coronado J A, del Carmen Flores-Miranda M, González-Ocampo H A, Peraza-Gómez V. 2012. The prebiotic inulin increases the phenoloxidase activity and reduces the prevalence of WSSV in whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) cultured under laboratory conditions. Aquaculture, 362-363: 28-32. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.07.022
Misra C K, Das B K, Mukherjee S C, Pattnaik P. 2006. Effect of long term administration of dietary β-glucan on immunity, growth and survival of Labeo rohita fingerlings. Aquaculture, 255(1-4): 82-94. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.12.009
Mouriño J L P, Do Nascimento Vieira F, Jatobá A B, Da Silva B C, Jesus G F A, Seiffert W Q, Martins M L. 2012. Effect of dietary supplementation of inulin and W. cibaria on haemato-immunological parameters of hybrid surubim (Pseudoplatystoma sp). Aquaculture Nutrition, 18(1): 73-80. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2095.2011.00879.x
Newaj-Fyzul A, Al-Harbi A H, Austin B. 2014. Review: developments in the use of probiotics for disease control in aquaculture. Aquaculture, 431: 1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.08.026
Pandiyan P, Balaraman D, Thirunavukkarasu R, George E G J, Subaramaniyan K, Manikkam S, Sadayappan B. 2013. Probiotics in aquaculture. Drug Invention Today, 5(1): 55-59. DOI:10.1016/j.dit.2013.03.003
Pool-Zobel B, Van Loo J, Rowland I, Roberfroid M B. 2002. Experimental evidences on the potential of prebiotic fructans to reduce the risk of colon cancer. British Journal of Nutrition, 87(S2): S273-S281. DOI:10.1079/bjn/2002548
Proespraiwong P, Tassanakajon A, Rimphanitchayakit V. 2010. Chitinases from the black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon: phylogenetics, expression and activities. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 156(2): 86-96. DOI:10.1016/j.cbpb.2010.02.007
Ringø E, Olsen R E, Gifstad T Ø, Dalmo R A, Amlund H, Hemre G I, Bakke A M. 2010. Prebiotics in aquaculture: a review. Aquaculture Nutrition, 16(2): 117-136. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2095.2009.00731.x
Roberfroid M B. 2005. Introducing inulin-type fructans. British Journal of Nutrition, 93(S1): S13-S25. DOI:10.1079/bjn20041350
Rossi M, Corradini C, Amaretti A, Nicolini M, Pompei A, Zanoni S, Matteuzzi D. 2005. Fermentation of fructooligosaccharides and inulin by bifidobacteria: a comparative study of pure and fecal cultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71(10): 6150-6158. DOI:10.1128/aem.71.10.6150-6158.2005
Rumessen J J, Gudmand-Høyer E. 1998. Fructans of chicory: intestinal transport and fermentation of different chain lengths and relation to fructose and sorbitol malabsorption. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 68(2): 357-364. DOI:10.1093/ajcn/68.2.357
Safari O, Shahsavani D, Paolucci M, Atash M M S. 2014. Single or combined effects of fructo- and mannan oligosaccharide supplements on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, immune responses and stress resistance of juvenile narrow clawed crayfish, Astacus leptodactylus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, 1823. Aquaculture, 432: 192-203. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.05.012
Sahu M K, Swarnakumar N S, Sivakumar K, Thangaradjou T, Kannan L. 2008. Probiotics in aquaculture: importance and future perspectives. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 48(3): 299-308. DOI:10.1007/s12088-008-0024-3
Sang H M, Fotedar R. 2010. Effects of mannan oligosaccharide dietary supplementation on performances of the tropical spiny lobsters juvenile (Panulirus ornatus, Fabricius 1798). Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 28(3): 483-489. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2009.12.011
Shi H, Yan X F, Xu X, Ruan L W. 2012. Molecular cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding extracellular signal-regulated kinase from Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 33(4): 813-820. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2012.07.008
Soares M P, Oliveir F C, Cardoso I L, Urbinati E C, Meldau de Campos C, Hisano H. 2018. Glucan-MOS® improved growth and innate immunity in pacu stressed and experimentally infected with Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 73: 133-140. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2017.11.046
Stephens A, Rojo L, Araujo-Bernal S, Garcia-Carreño F, Muhlia-Almazan A. 2012. Cathepsin B from the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei: cDNA sequence analysis, tissues-specific expression and biological activity. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 161(1): 32-40. DOI:10.1016/j.cbpb.2011.09.004
Syed Raffic Ali S, Ambasankar K, Nandakumar S, Ezhil Praveena P, Syamadayal J. 2016. Effect of dietary prebiotic inulin on growth, body composition and gut microbiota of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer). Animal Feed Science and Technology, 217: 87-94. DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.04.011
Van de Wiele T, Boon N, Possemiers S, Jacobs H, Verstraete W. 2007. Inulin-type fructans of longer degree of polymerization exert more pronounced in vitro prebiotic effects. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 102(2): 452-460. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03084.x
Van Doan H, Hoseinifar S H, Faggio C, Chitmanat C, Mai N T, Jaturasitha S, Ringø E. 2018. Effects of corncob derived xylooligosaccharide on innate immune response, disease resistance, and growth performance in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. Aquaculture, 495: 786-793. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.06.068
Walker P J, Mohan C V. 2009. Viral disease emergence in shrimp aquaculture: origins, impact and the effectiveness of health management strategies. Reviews in Aquaculture, 1(2): 125-154. DOI:10.1111/j.1753-5131.2009.01007.x
Wang Y B. 2007. Effect of probiotics on growth performance and digestive enzyme activity of the shrimp Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture, 269(1-4): 259-264. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.05.035
Wardwell L H, Huttenhower C, Garrett W S. 2011. Current concepts of the intestinal microbiota and the pathogenesis of infection. Current Infectious Disease Reports, 13(1): 28-34. DOI:10.1007/s11908-010-0147-7
Wen R, Li F H, Sun Z, Li S H, Xiang J H. 2013. Shrimp MyD88 responsive to bacteria and white spot syndrome virus. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 34(2): 574-581. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2012.11.034
Xie X X, Li H Y, Xu L M, Yang F. 2005. A simple and efficient method for purification of intact white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) viral particles. Virus Research, 108(1-2): 63-67. DOI:10.1016/j.virusres.2004.08.002
Xu B H, Wang Y B, Li J R, Lin Q. 2009. Effect of prebiotic xylooligosaccharides on growth performances and digestive enzyme activities of allogynogenetic crucian carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 35(3): 351-357. DOI:10.1007/s10695-008-9248-8
Xue S X, Yang W J, Sun J S. 2013. Role of chymotrypsin-like serine proteinase in white spot syndrome virus infection in Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 34(2): 403-409. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2012.10.017
Zhang C N, Tian H Y, Li X F, Zhu J, Cai D S, Xu C, Wang F, Zhang D D, Liu W B. 2014. The effects of fructooligosaccharide on the immune response, antioxidant capability and HSP70 and HSP90 expressions in blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala Yih) under high heat stress. Aquaculture, 433: 458-466. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.07.007
Zhou K M, Zhou F L, Huang J H, Yang Q B, Jiang S, Qiu L H, Yang L S, Zhu C Y, Jiang S G. 2017. Characterization and expression analysis of a chitinase gene (PmChi-4) from black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) under pathogen infection and ambient ammonia nitrogen stress. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 62: 31-40. DOI:10.1016/j.fsi.2017.01.012