Cite this paper:
SHI Ce, GAO Xiaolong, LIU Ying, WANG Chunlin. Long-term monitoring of the individual self-feeding behavior of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss[J]. HaiyangYuHuZhao, 2019, 37(1): 344-349

Long-term monitoring of the individual self-feeding behavior of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss

SHI Ce1,2,3, GAO Xiaolong3, LIU Ying4, WANG Chunlin1,2
1 Key Laboratory of Applied Marine Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Faculty of Life Science and Biotechnology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China;
2 Collaborative Innovation Center for Zhejiang Marine High-efficiency and Healthy Aquaculture, Ningbo 315211, China;
3 Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China;
4 College of Marine Technology and Environment, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China
Abstract:
Self-feeding device is extensively used in aquaculture farms, but for salmonids the individual feeding behavior has seldom been continuously observed. In this article, the individual self-feeding behavior of 10 rainbow trout was continuously monitored with a PIT tag record for 50 days with three replicates. The fish fell into three categories according to their feeding behavior, i.e. high triggering fish (trigger behavior more than 25% of the group, HT), low triggering fish (1%-25%, LT) and zero triggering fish (less than 1%). The results showed that in a group of 10 individual 1-2 HT fish accounted for most of the self-feeding behavior (78.19%-89.14%), which was far more than they could consume. The trigger frequency of the fish was significantly correlated with the initial body weight (P<0.01), however, no significant difference in growth rate among the HT, LT, and ZT fish was observed (P>0.05). Cosinor analysis showed that the two HT fish in the same group had similar acrophase. Though some of the HT fish could be active for 50 d, there were also HT fish decreased triggering behavior around 40 d and the high trigger status was then replaced by other fish, which was first discovered in salimonds. Interestingly, the growth of the group was not affected by the alternation triggering fish. These results provide evidence that in the self-feeding system the HT fish didn't gain much advantage by their frequent self-feeding behavior, and high trigger status of the HT fish is not only an individual character but also driven by the demand of the group. In the self-feeding system, the critical individual should be closely monitored.
Key words:    self-feeding system|individual feeding behavior|growth|feeding rhythm   
Received: 2018-02-01   Revised: 2018-03-16
Tools
PDF (781 KB) Free
Print this page
Add to favorites
Email this article to others
Authors
Articles by SHI Ce
Articles by GAO Xiaolong
Articles by LIU Ying
Articles by WANG Chunlin
References:
Alanärä A, Brännäs E. 1996. Dominance in demand-feeding behaviour in Arctic charr and rainbow trout:the effect of stocking density. Journal of Fish Biology, 48(2):242-254.
Attia J, Millot S, Di-Poï C, Bégout M L, Noble C, SanchezVazquez F J, Terova G, Saroglia M, Damsgård B. 2012.
Demand feeding and welfare in farmed fish. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 38(1):107-118.
Brown J L. 1964. The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. The Wilson Bulletin, 76(2):160-169.
Bureau D P, Hua K, Cho C Y. 2006. Effect of feeding level on growth and nutrient deposition in rainbow trout(Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum) growing from 150 to 600. Aquaculture Research, 37(11):1 090-1 098.
Chen W M, Naruse M, Tabata M. 2002. Circadian rhythms and individual variability of self-feeding activity in groups of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum).Aquaculture Research, 33(7):491-500.
Covès D, Beauchaud M, Attia J, Dutto G, Bouchut C, Bégout M L. 2006. Long-term monitoring of individual fish triggering activity on a self-feeding system:an example using European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax).Aquaculture, 253(1-4):385-392.
Cubitt K F, Winberg S, Huntingford F A, Kadri S, Crampton V O, Øverli Ø. 2008. Social hierarchies, growth and brain serotonin metabolism in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)kept under commercial rearing conditions. Physiology & Behavior, 94(4):529-535.
Di-Poï C, Attia J, Bouchut C, Dutto G, Covès D, Beauchaud M. 2007. Behavioral and neurophysiological responses of European sea bass groups reared under food constraint.Physiology & Behavior, 90(4):559-566.
Di-Poi C, Beauchaud M, Bouchut C, Dutto G, Covès D, Attia J. 2008. Effects of high food-demand fish removal in groups of juvenile sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax).Canadian Journal of Zoology, 86(9):1 015-1 023.
Ferrari S, Benhaïm D, Colchen T, Chatain B, Bégout M L. 2014. First links between self-feeding behaviour and personality traits in European seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 161:131-141.
Heydarnejad M S, Purser J. 2013. Demand-feeding activity of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Raceways. World Journal of Zoology, 8(1):36-46.
Jobling M. 1995. Simple indices for the assessment of the influences of social environment on growth performance, exemplified by studies on Arctic charr. Aquaculture International, 3(1):60-65.
Millot S, Bégout M L, Person-Le Ruyet J, Breuil G, Di-Poï C, Fievet J, Pineau P, Roué M, Sévère A. 2008. Feed demand behavior in sea bass juveniles:Effects on individual specific growth rate variation and health (inter-individual and inter-group variation). Aquaculture, 274(1):87-95.
Millot S, Bégout M L. 2009. Individual fish rhythm directs group feeding:a case study with sea bass juveniles(Dicentrarchus labrax) under self-demand feeding conditions. Aquatic Living Resources, 22(3):363-370.
Millot S, Nilsson J, Fosseidengen J E, Bégout M L, Fernö A, Braithwaite V A, Kristiansen T S. 2014. Innovative behaviour in fish:Atlantic cod can learn to use an external tag to manipulate a self-feeder. Animal Cognition, 17(3):779-785.
Refinetti R, Cornélissen G, Halberg F. 2007. Procedures for numerical analysis of circadian rhythms. Biological Rhythm Research, 38(4):275-325.
Sunuma T, Amano M, Yamanome T, Yamamori K. 2009.Individual variability of self-feeding activity in groupreared barfin flounder. Fisheries Science, 75(5):1 295-1 300.