Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology   2015, Vol. 33 Issue(6): 1461-1475     PDF       
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00343-015-4368-3
Shanghai University
0

Article Information

Jeffrey A. THORNTON, Thomas M. SLAWSKI, Hebin LIN
Salinization: the ultimate threat to temperate lakes, with particular reference to Southeastern Wisconsin (USA)
Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2015, 33(6): 1461-1475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00343-015-4368-3

Article History

Received Dec. 12, 2014
accepted in principle Apr. 27, 2015;
accepted for publication May 27, 2015
Salinization: the ultimate threat to temperate lakes, with particular reference to Southeastern Wisconsin (USA)
Jeffrey A. THORNTON1,2,3 , Thomas M. SLAWSKI1,4, Hebin LIN1       
1 International Environmental Management Services Ltd., P O Box5 10373, New Berlin, WI5 3151-0373, United States of America;
2 Watershed Services Coordinator, The Meadows Center for Water and the Environment, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, United States of America;
3 Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, 3-11 Tsurukabuto, Nada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan;
4 Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, W239 N1812 Rockwood Drive, P. O. Box 1607, Waukesha, WI;
5 3187-1607, United States of America
ABSTRACT:Many lakes in Southeastern Wisconsin (the metropolitan-Milwaukee area) are gradually becoming increasingly "salty". While these waterbodies would not be considered presently to be saline lakes, there has been a rapid increase in the chloride concentrations in most of these lakes over the last 30 years, with the lakes increasing from a mean chloride concentration of about 19 mg/L to over 100 mg/L in some cases. While ecological impacts can be expected when chloride values exceed 250 mg/L, the rate of increase presents a basis for concern, especially since the underlying geology of the region is based on limestone/dolomite which is deficient in chlorides. Thus, the origin of the chlorides is anthropogenic: human and industrial wastewaters (treatment of which has effected improvements in trophic status but has not affected other water-borne contaminants) and winter de-icing practices based upon large quantities of sodium chloride are major contributors to the increasing concentrations of chloride in the region's waterways. Without taking remedial measures, the rate of salinization is expected to continue to increase, resulting, ultimately, in the alteration of the freshwater systems in the region.
Keywords: salinization     temperate lakes     chloride concentrations     salt management    
1 INTRODUCTION

Salinization is the process whereby mineral salts, principally chlorides, enter and concentrate in aquatic systems. Salinization occurs naturally in regions with salt deposits at or near the land surface and as a result of groundwater inflows into surface water courses in such regions. Human activities can exacerbate this process by flushing salts into the surface water courses through irrigation practices and groundwater pumping(Williams, 1998). Well-known examples of the impact of irrigation practices on the salinity of surface waters can be found in the Aral Sea basin of Central Asia(Micklin and Aladin, 2008) and the Salton Sea of the western United States(Carpelan, 1958; Miles et al., 2009; Cohen, 2014), where irrigated agriculture has flushed sufficient salts into the waterbodies that they have become hypersaline. These waterbodies also demonstrate the two key principles associated with salt lakes enumerated by Williams(1998); namely, that saline lakes generally occur as terminal lakes within closed or endorheic basins and in areas where rainfalland evaporation and /or groundwater infiltration are balanced. While such conditions occur across the world, most saline lakes tend to be located in semi-arid and arid parts of the globe.

The waterbodies of southeastern Wisconsin clearly would not fit into the two criteria set forth by Williams(1998). Southeastern Wisconsin is located in a region with moderate rainfalland an abundance of surface waters, many of which are linked by the several major rivers of the region(SEWRPC, 1995a). In addition, the underlying geology of the region is comprised of limestone and dolomite, in which chlorides are almost completely absent. Notwithst and ing, the concentrations of chlorides within these waters are and have been constantly increasing since the 1970s. In this paper, we review the rates of increase in chloride concentrations in some of the region’s major lakes and explore some of the likely causative factors affecting these increasing chloride concentrations. We further speculate about some of the potential consequences of this increase in chloride concentration, and present some possible remedial measures that will slow this rapid salinization of 2 GEOLOGY OF SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

While the glaciation and subsequent retreat of the glaciers from Southeastern Wisconsin played a major role in shaping the surface water features of the region, the underlying geology of the area has played a major role in determining the water quality of these resources. The land scape of the Southeastern Wisconsin region is comprised of ridges and valleys sculpted by the deposition of glacial debris. Underlying these glacial deposits is limestone and dolomite bedrock, overlying s and stone, from which the limestone and dolomite are separated by a layer of shale. This shale layer limits exchange between the groundwater aquifers contained in the two primary bedrock layers. The result of this geology is that the surface( and ground)waters of Southeastern Wisconsin are rich in carbonates but poor in chlorides. In short, there are few sources of natural chlorides which would contribute to the salinization of the surface waters of the region.

3 THE GEOGRAPHY OF WISCONSIN LAKES

Most lakes in the State of Wisconsin can be dated to the end of the Wisconsonin Ice Age. Many lakes, especially those in Southeastern Wisconsin, were formed as the glaciers retreated from the area that is now the north central United States. The State of Wisconsin claims 15 000 inland lakes, which include both internally drained waterbodies(generally created by ice calving from the glacier and forming single lake basins within a land scape of glacial tills, moraines, and wetland s), and more traditional riverrun lakes. The former or so-called “kettle” lakes are scattered throughout the land scape along the various terminal moraines formed by the retreating glaciers. The latter, river-run lakes, either flow in an easterly direction and lie along river courses that typically drain to either the Laurentian Great Lakes(specifi cally Lake Michigan) and , or in a westerly direction to the Mississippi River system. The distribution of the drainage systems forms the mid-continental divide, which runs through the region from southeast to northwest, as shown in Fig. 1. Two of the world’s largest lakes, Lake Michigan and Lake Superior, border the east and north of the State of Wisconsin. It is this location at the headwaters of both the St Lawrence River and the Mississippi River that gives the waters of Southeastern Wisconsin their great importance: degradation of water quality in these systems has the potential to initiate a cascade of consequences affecting much of North America( and beyond, as the contaminants enter the global circulation of the Atlantic Ocean).

Fig. 1 Major lake and river systems of North America and the location of Southeastern Wisconsin in the headwaters of the St. Lawrence and Mississippi River systems
4 A BRIEF HISTORY OF LAKES IN WISCONSIN

In the mid-1800s, when the Wisconsin Territory was admitted to the United States as the State of Wisconsin, waterways and highways were given the same legal status in Chapter IX of the Wisconsin Constitution as essential transportation corridors within the State. For more than 100 years the waterways of the new State had been used as transportation corridors, linking the French and English trading centers of Canada with the fur-bearing areas of the Great Lakes region and the Mississippi River basin. In the early days of the State, these waterways retained their premier position as transportation corridors. These waterways also provided the power to drive the sawmills which produced the lumber necessary to build the growing country.

By the early 1900s, the waterways of Wisconsin retained their supremacy as power sources, but now powering grist mills and turbines to process grains and provide the electrical power for the emerging metropolitan centers. Many inland lakes were augmented with low-head dams to increase their generating capacities, while signifi cant large hydroelectric dams were built on the Wisconsin River, a tributary of the Mississippi River.

By the 1960s, however, many Wisconsin lakes had been reduced to being receptacles of stormwater and wastewater. But, at this time, people increasingly were being drawn to these waterbodies in search of opportunities for the pursuit of leisure activities. Dem and for lakefront property rose and Wisconsin became a desirable destination for tourism and recreation. Consequently, in the early-1970s, public outrage at the degradation of their waterbodies had reached a peak and the federal Clean Water Act was adopted. Using both federaland state funds, the municipalities of Wisconsin introduced or improved sewerage systems and undertook the rehabilitation of the heretofore degraded waters of the State. Lakes such as Delavan Lake in Southeastern Wisconsin became watch words for successful lake management interventions(Robertson et al., 2000; SEWPRC, 2002). Currently, the waterbodies in Southeastern Wisconsin are mesotrophic, and have either an improved trophic status or unchanged trophic status as a result of these interventions(SEWRPC, 1995a).

5 METHODS

The data presented herein were compiled in the course of preparing management plans for a number of the major lakes in Southeastern Wisconsin while the senior author was employed as a Principal Planner by the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission(SEWRPC). These plans typically highlighted management interventions focused on nutrients of anthropogenic origin, addressing concerns regarding nutrient enrichment or eutrophication, and the resultant growth of aquatic plants, and addressing recreational water uses by riparian communities and other recreational water users. Review of water quality data formed a major part of the planning programs. In reviewing these data, staff from the SEWRPC attempted to assemble existing data on all aspects of the waterbodies that formed the focus of the planning programs. These data included geographic information documenting not only the physical attributes of the waterbodies and their watersheds, but also quantifying land uses, population distributions, and biological conditions as elements infl uencing water quality. All of the lake management plans can be accessed through the Commission’s website, www.sewrpc.org, under the “Data and Publications” tab.

The majority of the water quality data used in this paper was abstracted from the annual Water Data reports, published by the United States Geological Survey(USGS)in the series Water-Quality and Lake-Stage Data for Wisconsin Lakes(see U.S. Geological Survey, 2012). These data were contrasted with the data compiled by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources(WDNR)based upon a statewide survey conducted during the late-1960s and 1970s(Lillie et al., 1983). All of these data were analyzed by the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene using st and ard methods of analysis and federally-accepted quality controland quality assurance practices. Many of the recent data collection programs were supported in part by grants from the Wisconsin Lake Management Planning Grant Program and Wisconsin Lake Protection and Classification Grant Program, codified in Chapters NR 190 and NR 191, respectively, of the Wisconsin Administrative Code, and administered by the WDNR. These programs are funded from the State’s gasoline taxes, specifically those taxes collected from the sale of boat engine fuels(while there is no easy way to distinguish fuels purchased for use in motor cars versus those utilized in motor boats, the Wisconsin Legislature has established a formula by which the gasoline tax revenues are split between roadways and waterways).

Forty lakes were included in the analysis. The morphology and locations of the lakes are given in Table 1 and shown on Fig. 2. The waterbodies ranged from large deep lakes, such as Geneva Lake, to large shallow lakes, such as Lac La Belle. The lakes included both headwater systems, such as Little Muskego Lake, and lakes located within chains of lakes. Both river-run and internally-drained waters also are included.

Table 1 Morphological attributes of the study lakes in Southeastern Wisconsin

Waterbody nameWatershed(latitude and longitude)Surface Area(km 2)Volume(10 6 m 3)Max. depth(m)Mean depth(m)Reference
1Little Cedar Lake Milwaukee 43.37°N 88.22°W0.983.917.13.9SEWRPC, 2004a
2Pike Lake Rock 43.31°N 88.33°W2.18.613.74.1SEWRPC, 2005a
3Friess Lake Rock 43.26°N 88.28°W0.483.814.67.9SEWRPC, 1997b, 2008b
4Lake Keesus Rock 43.16°N 88.31°W0.954.912.85.1SEWRPC, 1998a
5Ashippun Lake Rock 43.15°N 88.49°W0.331.712.26.7SEWRPC, 1982a, 2007c
6North Lake(Waukesha)Rock 43.14°N 88.37°W1.721.621.412.2SEWRPC, 1982b
7Lac La Belle Rock 43.13°N 88.52°W4.515.911.63.5SEWRPC, 2007b
8Moose Lake Rock 43.13°N 88.40°W0.322.918.68.8
9Okauchee Lake Rock 43.12°N 88.42°W4.740.327.58.4SEWRPC, 1981, 2003c
10Pine Lake Rock 43.12°N 88.38°W2.8 33.325.92511.712SEWRPC, 1998b, 2008a
11Fowler Lake Rock 43.11°N 88.49°W0.311.215.23.9SEWRPC, 1994, 2000a, 2012
12Beaver Lake Rock 43.11°N 88.36°W1.36.214.04.9SEWRPC, 2008a
13Oconomowoc Lake Rock 43.09°N 88.45°W3.130.518.39.8SEWRPC, 2009c
14Forest Lake Rock 43.09°N 88.41°W0.09-5.2-
15Lower Nashotah Lake Rock 43.08°N 88.43°W0.362.213.16.1
16Upper Nemahbin Lake Rock 43.07°N 88.43°W1.110.318.39.0SEWRPC, 1995b, 2009d
17Nagawicka Lake Rock 43.07°N 88.38°W3.856.727.514.6SEWRPC, 1999, 2001c, 2006a
18Pewaukee Lake Fox 43.07°N 88.30°W9.930.813.73.1SEWRPC, 2003d
19Lower Nemahbin Lake Rock 43.06°N 88.42°W1.13.410.93.1
20Middle Genesee Lake Rock 43.04°N 88.47°W0.411.811.64.4SEWRPC, 2003b
21School Section Lake Rock 42.97°N 88.52°W0.500.382.40.7
22Pretty Lake Rock 42.96°N 88.51°W0.260.739.52.8SEWRPC, 1998c, 2006b
23Little Muskego Lake Fox 42.91°N 88.14°W2.08.819.84.6SEWRPC, 1996, 2004b, 2009b
24Upper Phantom Lake Fox 42.85°N 88.35°W0.431.48.83.3SEWRPC, 2006d
25Potter Lake Fox 42.82°N 88.35°W0.651.67.92.4
26Wind Lake Fox 42.82°N 88.13°W3.711.114.32.9SEWRPC, 2008d
27Waubeesee Lake Fox 42.81°N 88.16°W0.523.022.25.8SEWRPC, 1990
28Booth Lake Fox 42.79°N 88.42°W0.451.77.33.7SEWRPC, 2003a
29Green Lake Fox 42.79°N 88.56°W1.2-16.8-SEWRPC, 2001b, 2010b
30Middle Lake Fox 42.78°N 88.56°W1.0-12.8-SEWRPC, 2001b, 2010b
31Mill Lake Fox 42.78°N 88.56°W1.1-13.4-SEWRPC, 2001b, 2010b
32Eagle Spring Lake Fox 42.85°N 88.44°W1.21.42.41.1SEWRPC, 1997a, 2010a
33Browns Lake Fox 42.69°N 88.23°W1.63.913.42.5
34Geneva Lake Fox 42.57°N 88.46°W21.0395.941.218.6SEWRPC, 2008c
35Hooker Lake Fox 42.56°N 88.11°W0.351.27.33.4
36Powers Lake Fox 42.55°N 88.28°W1.89.210.14.9SEWRPC, 2011
37Silver Lake(Waukesha)Rock 43.08°N 88.49°W0.898.613.49.6SEWRPC, 1993
38Benedict Lake Fox 42.53°N 88.29°W0.312.311.34.7SEWRPC, 2001a
39George Lake Fox 42.52°N 88.06°W0.240.484.91.9SEWRPC, 2007a
40Elizabeth Lake Fox 42.50°N 88.26°W3.58.59.83.4SEWRPC, 2009a

Fig. 2 Locations of the studied lakes within the Southeastern Wisconsin Region

Several lake chains were sampled. For example, in the western portions of the Southeastern Wisconsin region, the Oconomowoc and Bark Rivers form part of the Rock River system which is a tributary to the Mississippi River. Along the Oconomowoc River are Okauchee, Oconomowoc, and Fowler Lakes, all of which are located upstream of Lac La Belle. Paralleling this river is the Bark River, which, from upstream to downstream, includes Nagawicka Lake, Upper Nemahbin Lake, Lower Nashotah Lake, and Lower Nemahbin Lake. Further south within the region and draining to the Illinois-Fox River tributary of the Mississippi River system, Little Muskego and Wind Lakes form another chain of lakes.

In addition to the lakes and rivers draining to the Mississippi River system, lakes and rivers within the eastern portions of the region drain to the Laurentian Great Lakes system. Within this drainage system, Little Cedar Lake on Cedar Creek forms a tributary drainage system to the Milwaukee River.

Endorheic or internally-drained waterbodies also were included in the lake management plan formulation process. While these lakes are not directly connected to the surface drainage system, they do interact with the regional groundwater aquifers. Data from both the surfi cial aquifer(the limestone/dolomite aquifer) and the deep s and stone aquifer were abstracted from U. S. Geological Survey data reports and were used to evaluate the potential impacts of onsite sewage treatment systems as a source of chloride entering the surface drainage system.

All of the waterbodies included in this paper were the subjects of lake management plans prepared by SEWRPC. It was through the development of these plans, beginning in the mid-1990s, that the increasing salinization of the region’s lakes was fi rst observed and communicated to the scientifi c community through conference presentations, lectures, and plans. The resultant concern has led other researchers to identify similar trends elsewhere(see Löfgren, 2001; Marsalek, 2003; Jackson and Jobbágy, 2005; Smoland Douglas, 2007; Stefan et al., 2008).

Finally, in order to test the hypothesis that at least a portion of the chlorides entering the aquatic ecosystems of the region are derived from wastewater sources, we have compiled groundwater quality data from both the deep aquifer and the shallow, surfi cial aquifer. Should wastewater be a contributing factor to the salinization of the lakes of Southeastern Wisconsin, there should be a gradual increase in the chloride concentrations observed in the surfi cial aquifer as many of the residential properties of the region are served by onsite sewage disposal systems.

6 RESULTS

Figure 3 shows the trend in chloride concentrations in many of the major lakes within the Southeastern Wisconsin region. In almost every case, there is an upward trend in the data. This trend extends across all of the subwatersheds within the Southeastern Wisconsin region. These subwatersheds included the Milwaukee River watershed draining to Lake Michigan, and the greater Rock River basin and Illinois-Fox River basin draining to the Mississippi River. The majority of the waterbodies sampled were river-run lakes, with the majority of these waterbodies having an initial chloride concentration of less than 10 mg/L in the 1960s(Lillie et al., 1983). By 2005, most of the waterbodies sampled had chloride concentrations of greater than 20 mg/L. In some lakes, the levels of chloride approached and even exceeded 100 mg/L.

Fig. 3 Chloride concentrations in surface waters of Southeastern Wisconsin: 1970–2010

Several lakes showed an initial decline in chloride concentration during the 1970s. Lakes such as North Lake, Beaver Lake and Okauchee Lake are all waterbodies located along the Oconomowoc River tributary of the Rock River system draining to the Mississippi River. It is likely that this initial decline in chloride concentration is coincident with the start of operations of the Delafi eld-Hartland Water Pollution Control Commission, which diverted wastewater to a regional wastewater treatment centre during this period. In contrast, other lakes, such as Little Muskego and Wind Lakes, showed an initial increase in chloride concentrations even though wastewater was diverted from their inflows to treatment plants. In these two cases, road and highway improvements occurred at about the same time as the wastewater diversions, which may have offset and overwhelmed the benefi ts achieved from wastewater diversion(see SEWRPC, 1995a, 2006c).

Figure 4 shows a similar trend line for the chloride concentrations in surfi cial groundwater. The well depth of 150 m(500 feet)was selected as the depth at which the surfi cial aquifer gave way to the deeper s and stone aquifer at all points across Southeastern Wisconsin. While this depth varies with location within the region, ranging from a minimum of about 30 m, the break point of 150 m is adequate to encompass all surfi cial groundwater. In contrast, Fig. 5 shows the trend line for chloride concentrations in deep groundwater, within the s and stone aquifer. The same caveat regarding the 150 m depth applies; below 150 m the groundwater can be described as totally within the s and stone aquifer. In spite of the different scale, it is clear that the trend of increasing chloride concentration with time is present in the surfi cial aquifer but absent in the deeper s and stone aquifer. In the surfi cial aquifer, chloride concentrations rose from about 40 mg/L in the 1970s to about 80 mg/L in the mid-2000s.

Fig. 4 Chloride concentrations in surfacial groundwaters of Southeastern Wisconsin: 1975–2010

With respect to the specifi c changes in chloride concentrations in the forty lakes which represent the range of lakes and lake conditions within Southeastern Wisconsin, the majority showed a consistent increase in chloride concentrations(Fig. 3). Lake Keesus, Lac La Belle, and Pine, Middle Genesee, Moose, Okauchee, Oconomowoc, Powers, Potter, Pretty and Little Cedar Lakes represent the majority of the lakes, increasing from about 5–15 mg/L chloride in 1972 to between 20 to 40 mg/L by the turn of the millennium. Of these lakes, Lake Keesus, Lac La Belle and Oconomowoc Lake are relatively shallow. Together with Pine Lake and Okauchee Lake, these lakes form part of the Oconomowoc River drainage system. Middle Genesee Lake and Moose Lake are internallydrained waterbodies, and all of these waterbodies lie within an area of Waukesha County that has been experiencing increased urban development(SEWRPC, 2005), primarily comprising singlefamily housing units which have been built in planned unit developments(PUDs)with good highway access to metropolitan Milwaukee and its transportation hub linking the City to the greater Chicago region(SEWRPC, 2006c).

Lakes with the greatest rate of increase in chloride concentration included Little Muskego, Wind, Pewaukee and Pike Lakes, which had chloride concentrations in excess of 60 mg/L by the turn of the millennium. Little Muskego and Wind Lakes lie along a tributary to the Illinois-Fox River, while Pewaukee Lake drains through the Pewaukee River into the Illinois-Fox River system upstream of the point at which the combined flows from the Muskego Lakes and Wind Lake enter the main stem of the Illinois-Fox River. Pike Lake, in contrast, lies along a tributary to the Rock River. Pewaukee Lake and Little Muskego Lake may be considered as headwater lakes, while Pike Lake and Wind Lake are river-run or throughflow waterbodies.

The forty lakes included large, shallow lakes(such as Wind Lake and Lac La Belle); large, deep lakes(such as Little Muskego and Nagawicka Lakes); and , lakes of intermediate size and depth(such as Benedict, Okauchee, and Pewaukee Lakes). These lakes, also, included lakes within the Rock River subwatershed(such as Lac La Belle, Okauchee and Nagawicka Lakes), the Illinois-Fox River subwatershed(such as Benedict, Little Muskego, Pewaukee, and Wind Lakes), and the Milwaukee River subwatershed(Little Cedar Lake). Both shallow and deeper internally-drained lakes(such as Middle Genesee and Forest Lakes, respectively)also were included. L and uses in the watersheds of these lakes range from urban, as in the case of Fowler Lake, to ruraland periurban, as in the case of Potter Lake. All of the lakes supported a lakeshore residential community. While the rates of increase in the chloride concentrations of these lakes ranged from about 0.5 mg/L/year in the Oconomowoc River lakes(Okauchee Lake and Lac La Belle)to about 2.5 mg/L/year in the Illinois-Fox River lakes(Wind and Little Muskego Lakes), there was a consistent upward trend in chloride concentrations that occured regardless of lake morphology.

7 DISCUSSION

The WDNR noted that the average chloride concentration of lakes in Southeastern Wisconsin in the 1970s was 19 mg/L(Lillie et al., 1983). For our data set, the regional average for the period through 1970 was minimally higher, with a mean of about 20 mg/L. During the recent period, 2000 through 2008, however, the mean chloride concentration in the region was about 44 mg/L, or approximately double the concentration observed during a similar period approximately 40 years earlier. Prior to this time, Beeton(1965)noted that the chloride concentrations in Southeastern Wisconsin had remained relatively unchanged from the(unpublished)early observations of Birge and Juday between 1900 and 1910.

Although the inputs of nutrients to Southeastern Wisconsin lakes have been moderated, the water environment remains at risk. Sewage treatment practices are designed to remove nutrients, specifi cally phosphorus and nitrogen, reduce oxygen dem and of the effl uent, and minimize the discharge of viable pathogenic bacteria to the environment. These practices are ineffective at removing cations and anions from the waste stream, and many of these mineral salts pass through the wastewater treatment works relatively unaffected by the treatment process. In fact, Lillie et al.(1983)noted that where reductions in chloride concentrations have been recorded, as in the Madison Lakes, this has been due to the diversion of wastewater effl uents from the receiving waters and their subsequent dilution once the waste stream has been diverted.

This is not to say that the role of wastewater is negligible. Rather, the fi ndings of Lillie et al.(1983)reinforce the suggestion that chloride is entering the surface waters of Southeastern Wisconsin through the waste stream. This is supported by the fact that the surfi cial groundwater system also is being subjected to increasingly higher chloride concentrations. The seepage of chloride from wastewater treated using onsite sewage disposal systems can be inferred from the data presented in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, which show that there has been a consistent increase in chloride concentrations in the surfi cial aquifer while there has been no similar increase in the deep s and stone aquifer.

Fig. 5 Chloride concentrations in the deep sandstone aquifer of Southeastern Wisconsin: 1975–2010

Howard et al.(2006)give the average concentration of chloride in human excreta as 50 mg/L. Considering that the majority of the resident populations in the vicinities of the lakes, especially those in the rural areas, live in low-density suburban-density dwellings which are dependent upon onsite sewage disposal systems(SEWRPC, 2006c), it is likely that such systems provide a chronic input of chloride to the surfi cial groundwater system, and thereby to the lakes. In the urban areas, wastewater conveyance systems collect and transfer wastewater to treatment plants, which, since the 1980s, no longer discharge directly to lakes but rather drain to river reaches(SEWRPC, 1995a). While these treatment facilities do not remove chloride from the waste stream, they are unlikely to form a major contribution to the increasing chloride levels in the region’s lakes; concentrations of chloride discharged from treatment works in the region range from about 20 mg/L to about 130 mg/L.

A more likely factor contributing to the higher levels of chloride in the waste stream is the increasing and ongoing use of water softeners utilizing sodium chloride as an ion source. The Delafi eld-Hartland Water Pollution Control Commission notes that, nationwide in the United States, some 2.6 million tons of sodium chloride is used annually to operate water softener(Dela-Hart, undated). Operating these water softener as recommended typically consumed about 20 kg of sodium chloride per month; approximately one-half of this mass is discharged into the waste stream as spent chloride solution, entering the aquatic environment. SEWRPC(2005)has estimated that the numbers of households in the Southeastern Wisconsin region will have almost doubled between 1960 and 2010, increasing from about 465 913 households in 1960 to about 749 039 households in 2010. Assuming that about one-half of these households are in the metro-Milwaukee area and therefore are served by water-borne sewerage systems, and assuming that a further one-quarter of these households are in other urban centers served by water-borne sewerage systems, it can be estimated that remaining households, using onsite sewage disposal systems, would introduce about 1 875 tons of chloride into the surfi cial groundwater system annually. An equal mass of chloride is delivered to the surface water drainage system and thereby to the lakes, while about 3 750 tons of chloride are discharged to Lake Michigan in the treated wastewater effl uents of the coastal cities.

While wastewater and the household waste stream is one likely avenue for the introduction of chloride into the waters of Southeastern Wisconsin, it is probable that the major pathway for chloride to enter the aquatic ecosystem is through the application of sodium chloride as a de-icing agent during the winter months. The Wisconsin Department of Transportation estimates that the City of Milwaukee applies 55 000 tons of sodium chloride to 11 265 km of road surface each winter, whilst the larger Milwaukee County applies an additional mass of 40 000 tons of sodium chloride to its 3 862 km of roadways(Lins, 2010). In 2007–2008, the State of Wisconsin collectively applied 644 485 tons of sodium chloride to the State’s highway transportation network. All of this sodium chloride is ultimately washed off the road surfaces and into the closest streams, drains, and other conveyance systems which are generally connected to the waterways of the State. Assuming that one-half of this mass is comprised of chloride and that, being conservative and not utilized to any great extent by aquatic organisms, this seasonal input of chloride would amount to more than 47 000 tons of chloride annually, or 25 times that of onsite sewage disposal systems.

That said, the management challenge is one of maintaining highway safety during the winter months while minimizing the potential damage of aquatic ecosystems. To this end, the State of Wisconsin has encouraged local governments to use a salt-s and mix to minimize the mass of chloride being applied to the land surface during the winter. The s and can be swept up and potentially re-used, although there are concerns regarding heavy metals and other contaminants that may enter the s and during its time on the road surfaces. Alternatively, re-use of brines which are generated as waste products from the State’s industries has been proposed. Cheese brines, containing sodium chloride have been used with some success in the region, for example. Such waste re-use also may have negative consequences such as introducing oxygen-consuming substances into the environment. Finally, managing snow disposal to areas such as stormwater detention areas where flows can be controlled during the spring may have some effect in minimizing the movement of chloride from the land surface to the waters of the State.

The technique with the greatest promise for winter roadway maintenance is the use of calcium chloride as a wetting agent. Due to the fact that these solutions generate heat upon contact with water at air temperatures of -5°C and below they can be applied prior to a storm event, potentially resulting in savings associated with labor costs by allowing road maintenance to be undertaken during normal working hours. This solution also can be combined with s and in a 1:1 ratio for an even greater savings and reduction of chloride loads to the natural environment(SEWRPC, 2009c; Corsi et al., 2015).

Finally, the effect of variations in weather patterns should be considered. SEWRPC(2000b)analyzed the regional rainfall patterns and concluded that there was “no statistical basis to reject an assumption of stationarity” in regional climate over a planning period of up to 50-years in the metropolitan Milwaukee area. That said, review of the time series data shown in Fig. 3 does shown that years with high rainfall can result in slight reductions in chloride concentrations. For example, the 2001 data show a consistent dip in chloride concentrations in the majority of the lakes surveyed. This coincided with a period of extreme weather experienced throughout the upper Midwest of the United States(NCDC, 2002). However, the intensity of the response to this and previous events, such as the regional fl oods in 1993 and 1996(see U.S. Geological Survey, 2004), was relatively small in comparison with the trend in increasing chloride concentrations in the region.

8 CONCLUSION

While current chloride concentrations in Wisconsin’s waterbodies and ground waters is well below the action level of about 250 mg/L recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the World Health Organization(Baldwin et al., 2012, 2013), the steady increase in concentration at a rate of up to 2 mg/L per year during the last 40 years gives rise to a cause for concern, especially in Southeastern Wisconsin where naturally occurring chloride is virtually absent from the region’s geology. Therefore, the chloride entering the biosphere has to be of anthropogenic origin. Our analysis suggests that winter highway maintenance and the application of sodium chloride to highways as a de-icing agent is most likely to be the major pathway by which anthropogenic chloride is entering the biosphere in this region. Consequently, consideration should be given to alternatives, such as the use of a s and -calcium chloride mixture, which, while maintaining public safety, introduces much less chloride into the environment and consequently slows the rate at which chloride accumulation is occurring.

9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the organizing committee of the International Conference on Salt Lake Research which facilitated their attendance at the 12 th conference, held during July 2014 in Langfang near Beijing, China.

References
Baldwin A K, Graczyk D J, Robertson D M, Saad D A, Magruder C. 2012. Use of Real-time Monitoring to Predict Concentrations of Select Constituents in the Menomonee River Drainage Basin, Southeast Wisconsin, 2008-9. Scientific Investigations Report No. 2010-5064.U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
Baldwin A K, Robertson D M, Saad D A, Magruder C. 2013.Refinement of Regression Models to Estimate Real-time Concentrations of Select Contaminants in the Menomonee River Drainage Basin, Southeast Wisconsin, 2008-11.Scientific Investigations Report No. 2010-5174. U.S.Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
Beeton A M. 1965. Eutrophication of the St. Lawrence Great Lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr., 10 (2): 240-254.
Carpelan L H. 1958. The Salton Sea. Physicaland chemical characteristics. Limnol. Oceanogr., 3 (4): 373-386.
Cohen M J. 2014. Hazard's Toll: The Costs of Inaction at the Salton Sea. Pacific Institute Publ. Pacific Institute, Oakland CA.
Corsi S R, De Cicco L A, Lutz M A, Hirsch R M. 2015. River chloride trends in snow-affected urban watersheds:increasing concentrations outpace urban growth rate and are common among all seasons. Sci. Total Environ., 508:488-497.
Corsi S R, Graczyk D J, Geis S W, Booth N C, Richards K D. 2010. A fresh look at road salt: aquatic toxicity and waterquality impacts on local, regionaland national scales.Environ. Sci. Technol., 44 (19): 7 376-7 382.
Dela-Hart. UNDATED. Water Softeners and the Environment.Fact Sheet. Delafield-Hartland Water Pollution Control Commission, Delafield. 2p.
Howard G, Jahnel J, Frimmel F H, McChesney D, Reed B, Schijven, J, Braun-Howland E. 2006. Chapter 10, Human excreta and sanitation: Potential Hazards and information needs. In: Schmoll O, Howard G, Chilton J, Chorus I eds.Protecting Groundwater for Health: Managing the Quality of Drinking-water Source. IWA Publishing, London, UK.p.275-308.
Jackson R B, Jobbágy E G. 2005. From icy roads to salty streams. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102 (41): 14 487-14 488.
Lillie R A, Mason J W, Hine R L. 1983. Limnological Characteristics of Wisconsin Lakes. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin No. 138. 116p.
Lins T J. 2010. Keeping roads on a low-salt diet. Wisconsin Natural Resources Magazine, February. 7p.
Löfgren S. 2001. The chemical effects if deicing salt on soiland stream water of five catchments in southwest Sweden.Water Air Soil Poll., 130 (1-4): 863-868.
Marsalek J. 2003. Road salts in urban stormwater: an emerging issue in storm water management in cold climates. Water Sci. Technol., 48 (9): 61-70.
Micklin P, Aladin N V. 2008. Reclaiming the Aral Sea. Sci.Am., 298 (4): 64-71.
Miles A K, Recca M A, Meckstroth A, Spring S E. 2009. Salton Sea Ecosystem Monitoring Project. Open-File Report No. 2009-1276. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
NCDC (National Climatic Data Center). 2002. Climate of 2001-Annual Review of Significant U.S. and Global Events. National Climatic Data Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Survey, Asheville, NC. 11p.
Robertson D M, Goddard G L, Helsel D R, MacKinnon K L. 2000. Rehabilitation of Delavan Lake, Wisconsin. Lake Reservoir Manage., 16 (3): 155-176.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1981. A Water Quality Management Plan for Okauchee Lake, Waukesha, Wisconsin (Also Reporting on Lower Okauchee and Upper Oconomowoc Lakes). Community Assistance Planning Report No. 53(1st Edition). 164p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1982a. A Water Quality Management Plan for Ashippun Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Community Assistance Planning Report No. 54 (1st Edition). 108p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1982b. A Water Quality Management Plan for North Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 54. 139p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1990. A Water Use Management Plan for Waubeesee Lake and the Anderson Canal, Racine County, Wisconsin. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 182. 42p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1993a. A Lake Protection Plan for Silver Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. Memorandum Report No. 82. 61p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1993b. Aquatic Plant Management Plan for Phantom Lakes, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 81. 52p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1994. A Lake Management Plan for Fowler Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 181 (2nd edition). 144p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1995a. A Regional Water Quality Management Plan for Southeastern Wisconsin: An Update and Status Report, Part of 1 of 3, Chapters 1-7.Memorandum Report No. 93. 306p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1995b. Upper Nemahbin Lake Watershed Inventory Findings, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 101. 79p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1996. A lake management plan for Little Muskego Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Community Assistance Planning Report No. 222. 165p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1997a. A Lake Management Plan for Eagle Spring Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 226. 191p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1997b. A Water Quality Management Plan for Friess Lake, Washington County, Wisconsin.Community Assistance Planning Report No. 98 (2nd Edition). 128p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1998a. A Lake Management Plan for Lake Keesus, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 227. 116p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1998b. An Aquatic Plant Inventory for Pine Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. Memorandum Report No. 124. 56p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1998c. A Lake Protection Plan for Pretty Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. Memorandum Report No. 122. 106p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 1999. A Lake and Watershed Inventory for Nagawicka Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 130. 117p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2000a. An Aquatic Plant Management Plan for Fowler Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 134. 71p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2000b. Rainfall Frequency in the Southeastern Wisconsin Region. Technical Report No. 40. 97p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2001a. A lake Protection Plan for Benedict and Tombeau Lakes, Kenosha and Walworth Counties, Wisconsin. Memorandum Report No. 140. 118p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2001b. An Aquatic Plant Management Plan for the Lauderdale Lakes, Walworth County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 143. 209p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2001c. A Lake Management Plan for Nagawicka Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Community Assistance Planning Report No. 262. 101p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2002. A Lake Management Plan for Delavan Lake, Walworth County, Wisconsin. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 253. 267p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2003a. An Aquatic Plant and Recreational Use Management Plan for Booth Lake, Walworth County, Wisconsin. Memorandum Report No. 144. 92p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2003b. A Lake Protection Plan for Middle Genesee Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 148. 136p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2003c. A Water Quality Management Plan for Okauchee Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Community Assistance Planning Report No. 53 (2nd Edition). 252p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2003d. A Lake Management Plan for Pewaukee Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 58 (2nd Edition). 242p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2004a. An Aquatic Plant Management Plan for Little Cedar Lake, Washington County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 146. 103p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2004b. An Aquatic Plant Management Plan for Little Muskego Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 155. 73p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2005a. A Lake Management Plan for Pike Lake, Washington County, Wisconsin. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 273. 240p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2005b. Commission completes projections of regional population and household levels to the year 2035. Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission Newsletter, 42 (4):1-23.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2006a. An Aquatic Plant Management Plan for Nagawicka Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 161. 84p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2006b. A Lake Protection Plan for Pretty Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. Memorandum Report No. 122 (2nd Edition). 78p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2006c. A Regional Land Use Plan for Southeastern Wisconsin: 2035. Planning Report No. 48. 210p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2006d. A Lake Management Plan for The Phantom Lakes, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. Volume One, Inventory Findings; Volume Two, Alternatives and Recommended Plan. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 230. 277p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2007a. A Lake Management Plan for George Lake, Kenosha County, Wisconsin. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 300. 166p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2007b. A Water Quality Management Plan for Lac La Belle, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Community Assistance Planning Report No. 47 (2nd Edition). 225p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2007c. A Lake Management Plan for Ashippun Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Community Assistance Planning Report No. 48 (2nd Edition). 192p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2008a. An Aquatic Plant Management Plan for Pine and Beaver Lakes, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 173. 122p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2008b. An Aquatic Plant Management Plan for Friess Lake, Washington County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 169. 102p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2008c. A Lake Management Plan for Geneva Lake, Walworth County, Wisconsin. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 60 (2nd Edition). 194p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2008d. A Lake Management Plan for Wind Lake, Racine County, Wisconsin. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 198 (2nd Edition). 210p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2009a. A Lake Management Plan for Elizabeth Lake and Lake Mary, Kenosha County, Wisconsin, Volume One, Inventory Findings; Volume Two, Alternatives and Recommended Plan. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 302. 215p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2009b. An Aquatic Plant Management Plan for Little Muskego Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 155 (2nd Edition). 109p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2009c. A Water Quality Management Plan for Oconomowoc Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Community Assistance Planning Report No. 181 (2nd Edition). 206p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2009d. A Lake Protection Plan for Upper Nemahbin Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 176. 215p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2010a. A Lake Management Plan for Eagle Spring Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. Community Assistance Planning Report No. 226 (2nd Edition). 279p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2010b. An Aquatic Plant Management Plan for the Lauderdale Lakes, Walworth County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 143 (2nd Edition). 154p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2011. A Lake Protection Plan for Powers Lake, Kenosha and Walworth Counties, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 193. 183p.
SEWRPC (Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission). 2012. An Aquatic Plant Management Plan for Fowler Lake, Waukesha County, Wisconsin.Memorandum Report No. 134 (2nd Edition). 113p.
Smol J P, Douglas M S V. 2007. Crossing the final ecological threshold in high Arctic ponds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.A., 104 (30): 12 395-12 397.
Stefan H G, Novotny E, Sander A, Mohseni O. 2008. Study of Environmental Effects of De-Icing Salt on Water Quality in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area, Minnesota.Minnesota Department of Transportation No. 519. 72p.
U. S. Geological Survey. 2004. The Great Flood of 1993 on the Upper Mississippi River-10 Years Later. USGS Fact Sheet 2004-3024. United States Geological Survey.
U.S. Geological Survey. 2012. Water-Quality and Lake-Stage Data for Wisconsin Lakes, Water Years 2008-2011. Open-File Report 2012-1238. United States Geological Survey.
Williams W D. 1998. Guidelines of Lake Management:Volume 6, Management of Inland Saline Waters.International Lake Environment Committee Foundation and United Nations Environment Programme. 108p.